The article "Populism, Pluralism, and Liberal Democracy" by Marc F. Plattner, featured in the Journal of Democracy, delves into the complexities of democracy's status in the early 21st century, highlighting the challenges it faces and exploring the inherent tensions within liberal democracy.:
- Challenges to Democracy's Advance:
- After significant progress in the late 20th century, the expansion of democracy has stalled, with signs of potential erosion.
- The phenomenon of "authoritarian resilience" showcases how non-democratic regimes have maintained stability and power, challenging the assumption that authoritarianism is merely a transitory phase towards democracy.
- Resilience of Democracy:
- Despite challenges, democracy remains remarkably resilient, especially in countries with high per capita GDP where no consolidated democracies have experienced breakdowns.
- Democracy enjoys high legitimacy globally, reflected in its widespread endorsement and the lack of support for anti-democratic movements in established democracies.
- Dissatisfaction within Democracies:
- Within advanced democracies, there's widespread dissatisfaction with political life, including distrust in politicians and political institutions. However, this hasn't weakened the overall stability of democracy.
- The Dual Nature of Liberal Democracy:
- Liberal democracy is characterized by a tension between two components: the protection of individual rights and the principle of majority rule.
- This tension is not a flaw but a fundamental aspect that defines liberal democracy and contributes to its resilience.
- Populism as a Challenge and Corrective:
- Populism, which emphasizes the interests and feelings of the common people against a privileged elite, presents both a challenge to and a corrective for liberal democracy.
- While it can threaten the balance of liberal democracy by undermining minority rights and procedural norms, it also revitalizes political participation and challenges complacency among elites.
- Pluralism and Multiculturalism:
- Pluralism, referring to the diversity of groups within a polity, is a key aspect of liberal democracy that helps prevent the tyranny of the majority.
- However, radical pluralism or excessive emphasis on diversity can threaten social cohesion and the foundational consensus necessary for democracy.
- The Interplay Between Populism and Pluralism:
- Populism and radical pluralism, as opposing forces within liberal democracy, can paradoxically contribute to its resilience by counterbalancing each other.
- Populist movements' emphasis on majoritarianism is checked by the prevailing commitment to diversity and minority rights, preventing either from undermining democracy significantly.
- The Future of Liberal Democracy:
- The resilience of liberal democracy is contingent on maintaining a balance between its democratic and liberal components, amid changing intellectual and social currents.
- The ongoing debate on democratization, focused on the tension between illiberal democracies and the protection of rights, underscores the importance of this balance.
Plattner's analysis highlights the intricate balance within liberal democracy between majority rule and the protection of individual and minority rights. The tensions between populism and pluralism, while challenging, also contribute to the system's dynamism and resilience. The future of democracy depends on navigating these tensions without forsaking the core principles that underpin the democratic project.